Your catalogue, your inbox and your returns desk are eating your margin alive.
Listing 4,000 SKUs, answering 600 'where is my order' messages and processing returns by hand is no longer a competitive moat. Below are the 15 plays I run for retail and e-commerce brands, with the rupees you keep.
₹15.44 L / year saved
For a growing d2c / regional retail brand · math shown below
Calculations are for this size of business
Type
Growing D2C / regional retail brand
Annual turnover
₹2–6 Cr / year
Team size
8–25 people across ops, support and marketing
Locations
1 warehouse, online + 0–3 stores
Bigger setup? Multiply the numbers by your scale (e.g. 3 clinics ≈ 3× savings). Smaller? Divide. The ratio of savings to cost stays the same.
Catalog at scaleWISMO botReturns AIReviews & UGCPricing intel
Imad Khan · AI Automation
Built & shipped by Imaduddeen Khan — same engineer behind the heavy-haul AI platform
If this sounds like your week
You don't have a marketing problem. You have a 'too many manual hours per order' problem.
Read it honestly. If even three of these hit, you are bleeding hours and money you will never get back.
Catalog team copy-pasting titles, descriptions, attributes across Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho, Shopify.
"Where is my order?" messages outnumber actual sales conversations 5:1.
Returns and refunds eaten by humans clicking through 4 portals; RTO numbers untracked.
Same product photographed 6 times because nobody can find the original asset.
Reviews and UGC sitting in inboxes — never republished as social proof.
Festival sale planning still done on a 22-tab Excel.
540 hrs
Hours wasted today
team time / month
75 hrs
Hours after AI
466 hrs returned
₹1.29 L
Monthly cost saved
74% reduction
₹15.44 L
Annual savings
compounds every year
The 15 automations
Traditional way → AI way, with the math on the table
Every line below is a real workflow I have built or could ship inside 2–6 weeks. The per-task numbers describe a reference setup at the upper end (busy clinic, full QSR week, etc.) using a loaded labour rate of ₹320/hr. The headline savings of ₹15.44 L/year at the top of the page are these per-task savings scaled down to the growing d2c / regional retail brand described above. If your business is larger, multiply; if smaller, divide.
01 · Catalog
Multi-marketplace product listing & enrichment
Traditional way
Catalog ops writes title, bullets, description, A+ content, attributes per marketplace per SKU.
• Time: 22 min × 800 new/refresh SKUs
• Volume: ≈ 800 / month
• Total: 293 hrs / month
AI way (what I build)
Agent ingests vendor feed + images, generates marketplace-tuned titles, bullets, attributes, A+ HTML; runs SEO check; pushes to channels.
You'll be hiring an engineer who already shipped this.
The same systems described above — agentic workflows, document extraction, voice agents, secure APIs, deployment — are running today inside a logistics company I built for. Not slides. Production.
Production-grade systems
13 modules, real users, real money flowing through them — see the heavy-haul case study.
Industry-aware design
Workflows are designed around how your domain actually moves, not generic ChatGPT wrappers.
Fast turnaround
First working slice in 7–14 days, full build in 2–6 weeks for most workflows.
Honest pricing
Fixed-scope quotes. You see the calculation, the build cost, and the payback month before signing.
Questions store owners, D2C founders & ops heads actually ask
Frequently asked questions
Q.Which AI tools should a small D2C brand start with?
Start with the highest-volume pain: support tickets and abandoned carts. A WhatsApp + email AI agent that handles 70% of support and recovers carts pays for itself inside a month for most ₹2–5 Cr brands.
Q.Can AI write Amazon and Flipkart listings?
Yes — given your product data and competitor listings, an AI writes A+ content, bullet points, and even keyword-optimised back-end search terms. Human review takes 2 minutes per SKU instead of 30.
Next step is small
Send one WhatsApp. Get a free workflow audit.
I'll look at one painful workflow in your business and tell you, in writing, what it would take to automate it. No deck, no obligation.